Infrastructure communication: A systematic literature review

Main Article Content

Ratna Widianingrum
Hermin Indah Wahyuni
Rahayu

Abstract

In the last few decades, research on communication and development has developed due to the emergence of many development theories in third-world countries. This research aims to determine the research trends in the infrastructure sector from a communication perspective and identify gaps. Papers were selected based on specific words relevant to the issue of development communication and infrastructure communication throughout Indonesia. A total of 33 papers from international and national journals were analyzed to find several paper themes, and analyzed based on categories that emerged from these themes. The analysis results showed that there were only four papers still dominated by development communication. This study also identified gaps in the literature on infrastructure communication, especially those using Niklas Luhmann's Communication Theory. This systematic research (Systematic Literature Review) used the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis) method in which, as found, there has been no research on the theme of infrastructure in the field of communication science specifically looking at how it occurs or how communication on infrastructure communication itself really is. It is important to see the infrastructure problem entirely and cross-sectional subject in a unified system - not as the pieces of events in one research object/area. An understanding of communication issues in infrastructure development will make it easier for various parties to determine future communication.

Article Details

How to Cite
Widianingrum, R. ., Wahyuni, H. I., & Rahayu. (2024). Infrastructure communication: A systematic literature review. Communications in Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.21924/chss.4.1.2024.63
Section
Articles

References

Abels, J., & Bieling, H. J. (2023). Infrastructures of globalisation. Shifts in global order and Europe’s strategic choices. Competition and Change, 27(3–4), 516–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294221130119

Al Nahyan, M. T., Sohal, A. S., Fildes, B., & Hawas, Y. E. (2019). Infrastructure Development in The UAE: Communication and Coordination Issues Amongst Key Stakeholders. In S. Ogunlana & P. K. Dey (Eds.), Risk Management in Engineering and Construction (1st ed., pp. 352–374). Abingdon UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203887059-19

Al Nahyan, M. T., Sohal, A. S., Hawas, Y. E., & Fildes, B. (2014). Project Management, Infrastructure Development and Stakeholder Engagement: A Case Study from the UAE. Procedia Technology, 16, 988–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2014.10.052

Albert, M. (2016). Luhmann and Systems Theory. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.7

Angelakou, E.-P. (2020). The communication system in the school operation and development: The case of the Greek educational legislation. International Conference on Cultural Informatics, Communication & Media Studies, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.12681/cicms.2733

Arifudin, Wahyuni, Indah, H., Haryadi, & Trisakti, F. (2020). Haze Disaster Discourses in Local Indonesian Media: Examining Niklas Luhmann’s Perspective on Ecological Communication. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 20(1), 17–30.

Asian Institute of Transport Development (AITD). (2007). Toward an Asian integrated transport network (2th ed.). New York: UNESCAP and AITD. Retrieved from https://repository.unescap.org/handle/20.500.12870/2995

Butt, A., Naaronaja, M., & Savolainen, J. (2016). Project change stakeholder communication. International Journal of Project Management, 34(8), 1579–1595. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.08.010

Cervone, H. F. (2014). Effective communication for project success. OCLC Systems & Services: International Digital Library, 30(2), 74–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/OCLC-02-2014-0014

Chandra, H. P., . I., Wiguna, I. P. A., & Kaming, P. (2011). Peran Kondisi Pemangku Kepentingan Dalam Keberhasilan Proyek. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan, 13(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.9744/jmk.13.2.135-150

Chatra, E., Havifi, I., & Yenmis, D. (2019). DINAMIKA KOMUNIKASI KONTRAKTOR - PUBLIK: KAJIAN FENOMENOLOGI KOMUNIKASI DALAM PELAKSANAAN PROYEK INFRASTRUKTUR DI SUMATERA BARAT. Jurnal Ranah Komunikasi (JRK), 3(2), 90–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25077/rk.3.2.90-101.2019

CommGAP. (2009). The Contribution of Government Communication Capacity to Achieving Good Governance Outcomes. Washington, D.C. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/511591468331052544/The-contribution-of-government-communication-capacity-to-achieving-good-governance-outcomes

Cooren, F., & Seidl, D. (2020). Niklas Luhmann’ s Radical Communication Approach and Its Implications for Research on Organizational Communication. Academy of Management Review, 45(2), 479–497. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0176

Handaka, T., Wahyuni, H. I., Sulastri, E., & Wiryono, P. (2019). Changing communication systems and information flows: A case study of increasing regional autonomy and decreasing centralized power in a goat farming in Purworejo regency, Central Java, Indonesia. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 40(2), 296–302. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2019.40.2.01

Henckel, T., & McKibbin, W. (2010). The Economics of Infrastructure in a Globalized World: Issues, Lessons and Future Challenges. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Hernández-Linares, R., & López-Fernández, M. C. (2018). Entrepreneurial Orientation and the Family Firm: Mapping the Field and Tracing a Path for Future Research. Family Business Review, 31(3), 318–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486518781940

Higuchi, A. (2021). Double Symmetry in Niklas Luhmann’s Moral Communication. Kybernetes, 51(5), 1868–1878. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-11-2020-0826

Hu, Z., Li, Q., Liu, T., Wang, L., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Government equity investment, effective communication and public private partnership (PPP) performance: evidence from China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(9), 2811–2827. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-02-2020-0138

IMD. (2023). IMD World Digital Competitiveness Ranking 2023. Retrieved from https://www.imd.org/centers/wcc/world-competitiveness-center/rankings/world-digital-competitiveness-ranking/

Inagaki, N. (2007). Communicating The Impact of Communication for Development: Recent Trends in Empirical Research. Washington, D.C: The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7167-1

Jung, T. (2020). Mind the gaps: silences, political communication, and the role of expectations. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 24(3), 296–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2020.1796329

Kementerian PPN/Bappenas. (2019). Indonesia 2045: Berdaulat, Maju, Adil, dan Makmur. Jakarta. Retrieved from https://perpustakaan.bappenas.go.id/e-library/file_upload/koleksi/migrasi-data-publikasi/file/Policy_Paper/Ringkasan Eksekutif Visi Indonesia 2045_Final.pdf

Konold, D., & Schwietring, T. (2021). The Great Discrepancy: Political Action, Sustainable Development and Ecological Communication. Politics and Governance, 9(1), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3631

Kwofie, T. E., Ohis Aigbavboa, C., & Thwala, W. D. (2019). Communication performance challenges in PPP projects: cases of Ghana and South Africa. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(5), 628–641. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-11-2018-0137

la Cour, A. (2006). The concept of environment in systems theory. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 13(2), 41–55.

Laursen, K. B., Harste, G., & Roth, S. (2022). Moral Communication Observed with Social Systems Theory. An introduction. Kybernetes, 51(5), 1653–1665. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-01-2022-0059

Leydesdorff, L. (2021). The Evolutionary Dynamics of Discursive Knowledge : Communication-Theoretical Perspectives on an Empirical Philosophy of Science (W. Glänzel & A. Schubert, Eds.). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.

Luhmann, N. (1995). Social System (J. Bednarz & D. Baecker, Trans.). Standford, CA: Standford University Press.

Mattheis, C. (2012). The System Theory of Niklas Luhmann and the Constitutionalization of The World Society. Goettingen Journal of International Law, 4(2), 625–647. https://doi.org/10.3249/1868-1581-4-2-mattheis

Mazzei, L., & Scuppa, G. (2006). The Role of Communication in Large Infrastructure: The Bumbuna Hydroelectric Project in Post-Conflict Sierra Leone. In World Bank Working Paper (No. 84). Washington, D.C. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-6682-0

Mazzei, L., & Scuppa, G. (2013). The Role of Communication in Large Infrastructure: The Bumbuna Hydroelectric Project in Post-Conflict Sierra Leone. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-6682-0

Miller-Klugesherz, J. A. (2022). Integrating J.D. Peters’ Communication “Chasm” With Niklas Luhmann’s (1989) Ecological Communication to Analyze Climate Change Mitigation Inaction. Kybernetes, 51(5), 1775–1799.

Provost JR, W. H. (1986). Contingency and Complexity in The Social Theory of Niklas Luhmann. Int. J. General Systems, 12(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081078608934926

Putri, N. E., Frinaldi, A., & Mubarak, A. (2020). Communication Model for Sustainable Development of Public Transportation Infrastructure in West Sumatra. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Social and Political Sciences (ICOSAPS 2020), 510, 103–109. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201219.016

Quinteiro, M. E. M., & Calixto, A. J. (2020). COMPLEX SOCIETIES, HUMAN RIGHTS AND COMMUNICATION BETWEEN LEGAL ORDERS: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE DOCTRINE OF NIKLAS LUHMANN. Revista Argumentum-Argumentum Journal of Law, 21(2), 883–902.

Rodger, J. J. (2022). Luhmann’s theory of psychic systems and communication in social work practice. Journal of Social Work, 22(3), 637–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/14680173211008107

Schoeneborn, D. (2011). Organization as Communication: A Luhmannian Perspective. Management Communication Quarterly, 25(4), 663–689. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318911405622

Schwab, K., & World Economic Forum. (2019). The Global Competitiveness Report. Cologny. Retrieved from https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2019.pdf

Siswanto. (2010). SYSTEMATIC REVIEW SEBAGAI METODE PENELITIAN UNTUK MENSINTASIS HASIL-HASIL PENELITIAN (SEBUAH PENGANTAR). Buletin Penelitian Sistem Kesehatan, 13(4), 326–333. https://doi.org/oi:10.22435/bpsk.v13i4 Okt.2766

Šubrt, J. (2019). Niklas Luhmann’s system theory: A critical analysis. RUDN Journal of Sociology, 19(4), 607–616. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2019-19-4-607-616 Niklas

Suhardiyah, M., & Siswanto, A. H. (2020). KOMUNIKASI NIKLAS LUHMANN DALAM MEMBANGUN KERUKUNAN ANTAR UMAT BERAGAMA DI WILAYAH PERKOTAAN. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Communication, 3(1), 22–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35719/ijic.v3i1.811

Suharyo, S. (2018). A Communication Pattern of President in Infrastructure Development : The Case of Jokowi in The Daily Kompas News. E3S Web of Conferences, 73, 14023. EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201873140 23

T20. (2020). Building The Future of Quality Infrastructure. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/publications/building-future-quality-infrastructure

Thorpe, R., Holt, R., Macpherson, A., & Piiaway, L. (2017). Using Knowledge within Small and Medium-sized Firms: A Systematic Review of The Evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews.

Utomo, W. (2017, November 6). Tantangan Pembangunan Infrastruktur di Indonesia. KPPIP. Retrieved from https://kppip.go.id/opini/tantangan-pembangunan-infrastruktur-indonesia/

Valentinov, V., Roth, S., & Will, M. G. (2019). Stakeholder Theory: A Luhmannian Perspective. Administration and Society, 51(5), 826–849. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399718789076

Wahyuni, H. I. (2019). Ecological Communication in Information Society: Reflections on Niklas Luhmann’s Thought in Understanding Ecological & Disaster Issues in Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi: Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia, 4(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25008/jkiski.v4i1.270

Wahyuni, H. I. (2021). Tantangan Tata Kelola Komunikasi dan Informasi. In W. Kumorotomo & M. Subandi (Eds.), PEMIKIRAN GURU BESAR UNIVERSITAS GADJAH MADA MENUJU INDONESIA MAJU 2045: BIDANG SOSIAL HUMANIORA (p. 165). Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.

Weaver, N. (2022). Escalating complexity and fragmentation of mental health service systems: the role of recovery as a form of moral communication. Kybernetes, 51(5), 1800–1813. https://doi.org/h t t p://dx.doi.or g/10.1108/K-11-2020-0782

Wolor, C. W., Nurkhin, A., & Citriadin, Y. (2021). Leadership style for millennial generation, five leadership theories, systematic literature review. Calitatea, 22(184), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/22.184.13

World Bank, & Calabrese, D. (2008). Strategic Communication for Privatization, Public-Private Partnerships and Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects. In World Bank Working Paper (No. 139). Washington, D.C. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7499-3