Validity and reliability: Social attitude assessment instruments
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to develop an instrument for assessing social attitude competence whose constructs are valid according to experts and empirically valid and reliable based on field trials in Civics learning for high school students. This research was conducted through a quantitative descriptive approach at SMP Negeri 1 Gebang. Social attitude assessment instrument was used and it contained 28 items and an expert validation observation sheet. Design validation was done by reviewing the product design by three experts (expert judgment). The study was conducted to determine the feasibility of the instrument from the aspect of substance, construction, and language of the social attitude assessment instrument. Advice was given by experts after doing research to get approval, which was later used as a benchmark to state that the product was logically valid. The measurement of the content validity of social attitude statements was conducted using Likert scale and the reliability test used the Rasch Model approach. The results of the field test showed that the social attitude assessment instrument was valid in terms of content and constructs. The reliability test using the Rasch model approach showed that the product reliability was categorized as satisfactory. The final product is considered suitable for direct use by teachers and can be further developed with grid references.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Adams, R. J. & Khoo, S-T. (1996). ACER Quest: the interactive test analysis system. [Computer software]. Version 2.1. Camberwell, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research. https://research.acer.edu.au/measurement/3/
Anisah, G. (2018). Validitas Instrumen Asesmen Menulis Cerpen Terintegrasi Pendidikan Karakter. Al Ulya : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 3(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.36840/ulya.v3i1.148
Azwar, S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan Validitas edisi 4. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Djaali, & Muljojo, P. (2008). Pengukuran dalam Bidang Pendidikan. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Kunandar. (2015). Penilaian Autentik (Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013). Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Kustriyono (2004). Penyusunan Perangkat Soal Ujian Akhir Mata Pelajaran Sains-Biologi SMP dalam Rangka Pengembangan Bank Soal. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. 6 (2), 175-198, https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v6i2.2048
Musyarofah, Hindarto N & Mosik (2013). Pendidikan Karakter Terintegrasi dalam Pembelajaran IPA Guna Menumbuhkan Kebiasaan Bersikap Ilmiah. UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal, 2(2), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.15294/upej.v2i2.2665
Nurhadi, N., Rosidin, U., & Suana, W. (2014). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Sikap Spiritual dan Sosial pada Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika Universitas Lampung, 2 (4).
Sumardi Suryabrata. (2014). Metode penelitian. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi Permodelan Rasch pada Assessment Pendidikan. Cimahi: Trim Komunikata.
Suryani, I. (2016). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Sikap Ilmiah Pada Pembelajaran Dengan Model Latihan Penelitian di Sekolah Dasar. Pedadidaktika: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 3(2), 217–227.
Tiara, S. K., & Sari, E. Y. (2019). Analisis Teknik Penilaian Sikap Sosial Siswa dalam Penerapan Kurikulum 2013 di SDN 1 Watulimo. Edu Humaniora Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 11 (1), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.17509/eh.v11i1.11905
Yudha, R. P. (2020). Validity And Reliability Rubric Of Performance Assessment Geometry Study In Junior High School Using The Many Facet Rasch Model Approach. Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching. 9 (2), 26-36. https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v9i2.7100
Zanuddin, H., Shaid, N., & Halim, Z. (2021). Online learning platform during Covid-19 pandemic: An exploratory factor analysis on students’ attitude and perceived usefulness in media and communication education. Communications in Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.21924/chss.1.1.2021.7