The development of students’ adversity quotient through online learning models: A case study of an Islamic education course
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Students’ Adversity Quotient is one of the most significant elements in online education. This research focused on analyzing how the design of learning of an online Islamic education course called Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI) prepared the development of students’ adversity quotient. This research was located at a university in Malang, Indonesia and its methodology used qualitative case study. Based on Stoltz's Adversity Quotient theory (Stoltz, 1997), data collection for this study was carried out through online-based interviews, participant observation, and documentation. However, interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldana (Miles, et al., 2014) was used as data analysis. The research found that the PAI course at a university in Malang had a theoretical learning model, which could develop students’ adversity quotient. The theoretical learning model of PAI requires an ability to adapt cognitive structures through the stages of assimilation, accommodation, and equilibration of new knowledge, as well as psychic readiness to face challenges providing the development of students' adversity quotient. This theoretical learning model facilitated the development of students’ adversity quotient, as emerged through four indicators: resilient, persistent, sincere, and self-gratefulness. The contribution of this research is crucial to the implementation of online Islamic education learning through a theoretical learning model that will lead to benefits in achieving educational targets more effectively.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Abuhassna, H., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahya, N., Zakaria, M. A. Z. M., Kosnin, A. B. M., & Darwish, M. (2020). Development of a new model on utilizing online learning platforms to improve students’ academic achievements and satisfaction. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1).
Adriyanto et al. (2020). Peningkatan Kompetensi Strategis Siswa melalui Model Pembelajaran Conceptual Understanding Procedures. Justek: Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi, 2(1), 1–10.
Asy’ari, M., Ikhsan, M., & Muhali, M. (2018). Apa Itu Metakognisi dan Mengapa Penting? Prosiding Seminar Nasional Lembaga Penelitian Dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala, 340–344.
Blau, I., Shamir-Inbal, T., & Avdiel, O. (2020). How does the pedagogical design of a technology-enhanced collaborative academic course promote digital literacies, self-regulation, and perceived learning of students? Internet and Higher Education, 45(April).
Borokhovski, E., & et al. (2018). Achievement and attitudes in technology-supported postsecondary education: Complexity of relationships through the lens of meta-analysis. Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, 1994–2003.
Broadbent, J. (2017). Comparing online and blended learner’s self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance. Internet and Higher Education, 33(September), 24–32.
Carter, R. A., Rice, M., Yang, S., & Jackson, H. A. (2020). Self-regulated learning in online learning environments: strategies for remote learning. Information and Learning Science, 121(5–6), 311–319.
Dinsmore, D. L., Alexander, P. A., & Sandra M. Loughlin. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 391–409.
Dorji, R., & Singh, D. K. (2019). Role of Adversity Quotient in Learning. International Journal of Education, 11(46229), 119–125.
Engin, M. (2017). Analysis of Students’ Online Learning Readiness Based on Their Emotional Intelligence Level. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(12A), 32–40.
Gunduz, N., & Hursen, C. (2015). Constructivism in Teaching and Learning; Content Analysis Evaluation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191(392), 526–533.
Härkki, T., Vartiainen, H., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K. (2021). Co-teaching in non-linear projects: A contextualised model of co-teaching to support educational change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97(XXXX), 1–14.
Hooshyar, D., Pedaste, M., Saks, K., Leijen, Ä., Bardone, E., & Wang, M. (2020). Open learner models in supporting self-regulated learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education, 154(April), 1–19.
Jureynolds, & Ying, Y. (2020). Design and Implementation of Internet-Based Flipped Classroom in the Introduction to Chinese Business Course at the Chinese Department of BINUS University. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1477(4), 1–6.
Landrum, B., Bannister, J., Garza, G., & Rhame, S. (2020). A class of one: Students’ satisfaction with online learning. Journal of Education for Business, 96(2), 82–88.
Lee, D., Watson, S. L., & Watson, W. R. (2020). The Relationships Between Self-Efficacy, Task Value, and Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in Massive Open Online Courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 21(1), 1–22.
Lestari, S. (2020). Hubungan Kecerdasan Spiritual Terhadap Self Regulated Learning ( SRL) Pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Umum Universitas Malahayati Angkatan 2018. Anfusina: Journal of Psychology, 3(1), 85–96.
Li, S., Chen, G., Xing, W., Zheng, J., & Xie, C. (2020). Longitudinal clustering of students’ self-regulated learning behaviors in engineering design. Computers and Education, 153(November 2019), 103899.
Loeffler, S. N., Bohner, A., Stumpp, J., Limberger, M. F., & Gidion, G. (2019). Investigating and fostering self-regulated learning in higher education using interactive ambulatory assessment. Learning and Individual Differences, 71(February), 43–57.
Louca, E. P. (2003). Metacognition and Theory of Mind. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mulianti et al. (2018). Kompetensi Lulusan Pendidikan Vokasi: Peran Faktor dan Indikator yang Berpengaruh. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Asosiasi Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan Indonesia (APTEKINDO) 2018, 31–46.
Murty, B. V., & Rao, K. N. (2019). Digital Pedagogy–An Opportunity or a Threat? Proceedings of International Conference on Digital Pedagogies (ICDP), 1–5.
Parvathy, U., & Praseeda, M. (2014). Relationship between Adversity Quotient® and Academic Problems among Student Teachers. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(11), 23–26.
Rachmawati, R. (2018). Analisis Keterkaitan Standar Kompetensi Lulusan (SKL), Kompetensi Inti (KI), Dan Kompetensi Dasar (KD) Dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Tatar Pasundan : Jurnal Diklat Keagamaan, 12(34), 231–239.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional, Pub. L. No. 4301, Public Law of Republic of Indonesia 19 (2003).
Shyr, W. J., & Chen, C. H. (2018). Designing a technology-enhanced flipped learning system to facilitate students’ self-regulation and performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(1), 53–62.
Stoltz, P. G. (1997). Adversity Quotient: Turning Obstacles into Opportunities. John Wiley & Sons.
Vinas, D. K. D., & Aquino-Malabanan, M. G. (2015). Adversity quotient and coping strategies of college students in Lyceum of the Philippines University. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 2(3), 68–72.
Wardani. (2019). Pengaruh kecerdasan adversitas dan kecerdasan emosional melalui model inkuiri sosial terhadap keterampilan sosial siswa. Urnal Teori Dan Praksis Pembelajaran IPS, 4(2), 66–73.
Waschull, S. B. (2018). Improving Developmental Education Reform in Florida. In Promising Practices in Developmental Education (Vol. 182, Issue Summer 2018, pp. 75–83). New Directions for Community Colleges.
Widiantie, R., & Handayani, H. (2018). Kesadaran Metakognisi dan Keterampilan Memecahkan Masalah Mahasiswa melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah dengan Penugasan Individu. Quagga: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Biologi, 10(1), 56–62.
Wolters, C. A. (1998). Self-Regulated Learning and College Student Regulation of Motivational. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 284–290.
Wolters, C. A., Pintrich, P. R., & Karabenick, S. A. (2005). “Assessing Academic Self-Regulated Learning.” In What Do Children Need to Flourish? (pp. 251–270). Springer.
Yulanda, N. (2017). Pentingnya Self Regulated Learning Bagi Peserta Didik Dalam Penggunaan Gadget. Research and Development Journal of Education, 3(2), 164–171.